When I was listening to episode 171 of the No Such Thing as a Fish podcast titled No Such Thing as a Half-Ape Vampire*, the podcasters mentioned this confusing phrasing from The Independent’s article “The World Is Running Out of Camembert.” The article states:
Out of the three hundred and sixty million made each year, just a treasured four have true Camembert credentials.
That’s just over one percent.
When presented in an online article with ads and the creation of the new paragraph, the podcasters discussed thinking it was literally 4 camembert cheeses, significantly less than 1%. *Warning: if you choose to listen to this episode they also talk about maggot excrement in the cheesemaking process.
image from QI because there is no way I’m looking at pictures of cheese after listening
Rooted in our ideas of the American dream and meritocracy, we often judge poor people as deserving their fates. We tend to blame the individuals, stigmatizing them as lazy and gluttonous, instead of looking to structural factors. The poor are disproportionately young, female, and African American and Hispanic.
On The Daily Show in 2014, Jon Stewart examined Fox News’s coverage of food stamp recipients. In “What Not to Buy,” “Where Would Jesus Soil,” and “Fox News Welfare Academy” Fox News is critiqued for debating what can and should be covered, as well as who receives food stamps.
More recently on Full Frontal, Samantha Bee similarly examined the expense and subsidizing of diapers.
This clip from The Weekly addresses the islamophobia driving the controversy over Vegemite being certified halal in Australia. Being certified halal means no changes to the product itself, only that the product would be open to a larger market. But Australian Conservative senator Cory Bernardi has started a senate inquiry, claiming that making Vegemite halal might fund terrorism and lead to higher prices, both of which are untrue.
The article “German Pegida row over non-white photos on Kinder bars” explores reactions to the change in Kinder chocolate packaging. Some white people were infuriated, saying this was a case of political correctness gone amuck. It had to be pointed out that the new young men represented on the chocolates were, in fact, Germany’s football team as children. The article does not address how white people like to use people of color’s bodies for sports, music, or tourism but are not concerned with their safety or social inequality.
When we talk about diets to achieve the current definition of a ‘perfect body’ we are often talking about women. In this clip from Australian show The Weekly, young men’s use of sports supplements, and their lack of regulation, are critiqued.
In Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Pierre Bourdieu defines habitus as a system of dispositions we have as members of a social group of class. This includes the way we think, speak, act, learn and is rooted in our socialization. Our lifestyles and tastes are then a product of our habitus. Specifically we are limited by economic possibilities, whereby constraints become preferences and results in ‘choices.’ As stated by Bourdieu, “[t]hrough taste, an agent has what he likes because he likes what he has”.
There are some dominant sets of ideas that define what is culturally valued and desirable, regarded as objective realities. These are associated with specific social groups or classes, defining what is legitimate or worthwhile. For example, we hold classical music to be objectively better or more valuable than pop music.
To have cultural capital is not only to know the valued information, but to embody it, to look like it is natural and a part of who we are. Cultural capital, or the lack thereof, can be found in your dress, haircut, the way you hold your body, accent and manner of speaking. Bourdieu argues the rich discussing the “banalities about art…are inseparable from the steady tone, the slow casual diction, the distant or self assured smile, the measured gesture, the well-tailored suit.”
Comedian Jim Gaffigan talks about a number of issues around McDonald’s and consumption. Specifically I find his commentary referencing the negative cultural capital around eating at McDonald’s interesting. McDonald’s is not only not held in esteem, but it is generally thought of as cheap, poor quality food for unrefined palates. In the clip, Gaffigan talks about the negative stigma of consuming McDonald’s and connects it to similar practices lacking cultural capital. Though his comparisons might be considered offensive (references to sex work, tattooing), they are rooted in the cultural hierarchies and values he is satirizing.
“Its fun telling people you go to McDonald’s. They always give you that look like ‘Oh, I didn’t know I was better than you’.”
“I’m just here for the 99 cent ATM, what are you doing here Jim?” “I’m just meeting a hooker, I’m certainly not eating here.”
“I know some of you are like, “Sorry white trashy guy, I don’t eat McDonald’s””
“I’m tired of people acting like they are better than McDonald’s. Its like you may have never stepped foot in McDonald’s, but you have your own McDonald’s. Maybe instead of buying a Big Mac you read Us Weekly. Hey, thats still McDonald’s. Its just served up a little different.”
“It may take me a while to digest my Quarter Pounder with cheese, but that tramp stamp is forever.”